top of page

 Microplastics 

Are microplastics real and affecting our health? Why is the government allowing the productions of microplastics in our food chain supply in the first place?

 

​On average, people are ingesting approximately five grams of microplastics in a week this is equivalent to the weight of a credit card (“Plastic Ingestion by People Could Be Equating to a Credit Card a Week”). What is plastic? What is a microplastic?  “Plastics are groups of materials, either synthetic or naturally occurring, that may be shaped when soft and then hardened to retain the given shape. Plastic are polymers. A polymer is a substance made of many repeating units” (“Science of Plastics”). Microplastic are plastic debris that can come in all sizes, but typically are those that are less than 5 millimeters in length. Are microplastics real and affecting our health? Why is the government allowing the productions of microplastics in our food chain supply in the first place? Let’s examine these questions and conspiracies and discover the truth of microplastics.  

Used Plastic Bottle on Beach

One of the leading researchers in this field, Dr. Thava Palanisami is a brilliant and well-articulated man. Dr. Palanisami completed his PhD on the risk assessment, and remediation of mixed contaminants in 2010 at University of South Australia (“Dr Thava Palanisami”). His PhD displayed “chemicals in contaminated sites occur as mixtures rather than single contaminants, which had been the previous assumption for several decades” (1). His PhD primarily focused on the adverse effects on soil, then illustrating the chemicals of metals with high toxicity when compared to more bioavailable contaminants. Dr. Palanisami’s more recent research explains how microplastics are dangerous for people through digestion; “Microplastics can be small enough to be engulfed by cells, where they are transported by the lymphatic and blood systems and have the potential to bioaccumulate” (“Dr Thava Palanisami”). His research explains how microplastics contain harmful chemicals made during the manufacturing process. These chemicals are absorbing pollutants that are then ingested by humans. The effects of microplastics on the human body are still unknown; however, Dr. Thava is advancing our understanding of microplastics. Dr. Thava is a well-articulated man. An article for “Inspiring Plastic Professions” states, “The quality of his research on plastics has been recognized with several invitations from reputed international organizations, including the National Academy of Sciences and European Research Council” (ANTEC® 2023 | SPE.). Dr Palanisami has been a guest speaker at conferences and given talks like "POLLUTION AND HUMAN HEALTH" at Cherraan’s College of Pharmacy ("POLLUTION AND HUMAN HEALTH"…). Dr. Thava is a well-articulated man because he has given so many scientific lectures and conferences over his research. Another researcher connected to this conspiracy is Stephanie Dutchen, who is an intelligent and multifaceted woman. According to her Linkedin, Dutchen completed her Undergrad at Boston University with a Bachelors of Sciences, Journalism and English (Stephanie Dutchen - Harvard Medical School | LinkedIn.). Then she completed her Master of Science at MIT and wrote her thesis 12,000 words on the Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome research and patient care (1). Ms. Dutchen is currently the Editorial Director at Harvard Medical School (1). She received the GIA Silver Award for her feature story, “The Good That Viruses Do” and honorable mentions for “Help from Unexpected Corners,” which is an article about genetics and climate change (1).Ms. Dutchen is an intelligent-women because she has multiple different degrees and a diverse range of scientific articles. According to a Harvard Medicine article, “How a Warming Climate Wears on the Skin”, Ms. Dutchen explains the effects of the hot weather on our biggest organ (How a Warming Climate Wears on the Skin | Harvard Medicine Magazine). The rates of skin cancer have increased tremendously, and wildfires are spreading wreaking havoc on our environment and people. In the Live Science article, “Why Sugars May Be the Body's Superstars” Dutchen explains why sugar is such vital part of how our body functions by giving cells their energy (Dutchen and MacLachlan). Glycan plays a major factor in every role of the human body including identity markers on the cell and helping with the immune system and brain functions. In the Harvard Medical School article Microplastics Everywhere Ms. Dutchen says that  “Although the variety of microplastics and the difficulty of estimating accumulation in human tissues make it challenging to pin down risks, findings in models show inflammation, cell death, lung and liver effects, changes in the gut microbiome, and altered lipid and hormone metabolism” (Microplastics Everywhere | Harvard Medicine Magazine). The effects of microplastics are still being discovered, we do know that they are harming our external and internal environment. She has written a diverse range of scientific research and articles explaining many complex topics. Stephanie Dutchen is an extremely intelligent and multifaceted woman with a very impressive resume.

Conspiracy Theories 

In the conspiracies surrounding microplastics in our food, two main conspiracy theories will be explored. One of these conspiracies is questioning whether are microplastics real, and, if so, how could they be affecting our health. Similarly, the other conspiracy theory examines why is the government allowing the production of microplastics in our food supply chain in the first place. Let’s examine these questions and conspiracies and discover the truth of microplastics.One of these conspiracies is questioning whether are microplastics real, and, if so, how could they be affecting our health. Yes, microplastics are real and they are tiny pieces of plastic typically smaller than 5 millimeters (mm) in size, or similar to the size of a pencil eraser or smaller (US Department of Commerce). Most types of microplastic are invisible to the human eye because of their size, but they do have an important scientific role in making larger pieces of plastic. For example, microplastics can be found in skincare face washes, water bottles and synthetic clothes. Secondary microplastics come from larger pieces of plastics, such as beverage bottles, bags, and toys (1). The weather affects microplastics through heat, wind and even waves causing the plastic to break down into smaller pieces that fully never decompose. Continual wear and tear of plastics break down into microplastics. Another example of microplastics is found in synthetic clothing such as polyester or nylon. Through general wear or washing and drying, these tiny fibers break off and shed from larger items (1). Microplastics are found in everything in our oceans to the air we inhale. They are found in wildlife animals and found in food and drinks we ingest. How do microplastics affect our health? Scientists are continually working on how microplastics affect our health and our understanding of them. The results of cellular and animal experiments have shown that microplastics can affect various systems in the human body, including the digestive, respiratory, endocrine, reproductive, and immune systems (Lee, et al). When microplastics are ingested through our gastrointestinal tract, they cause inflammation, irritation, and bloating, and change the intestinal microbiome. Microplastics are changing our intestinal microbiome means it is hurting the good and bad bacteria leading to more intestinal issues. Additionally, microplastics entering through our digestive tract cause an increasing toxin load leading to ailments like vomiting, abdominal pain and throwing up. Microplastic effects on the respiratory system may cause oxidative stress in the airways and lungs when inhaled, leading to respiratory symptoms such as coughing, sneezing, and shortness of breath due to inflammation and damage, as well as fatigue and dizziness due to a low blood oxygen concentration (1). Microplastics in our endocrine systems cause hormone disruption leading to developmental and metabolic disorders. Microplastics can act as a medium for environmental toxic substances such as bisphenol A, which are absorbed into the body and cause various diseases of the endocrine system and reproductive system (1). Microplastics have been found in human breast milk and meconium, an infant’s first stool (Microplastics Everywhere). Microplastics are harming future generations before they reach adolescence. These are just a few examples of how microplastics are affecting our health through numerous body systems, and external factors that scientists are still uncovering. The other conspiracy is why is the government allowing the production of microplastics in our food supply chain in the first place? They are allowing the production of microplastics which are entering our food supply chain through our water, in the air and even in the animals we consume. If people are ingesting the equivalent of a credit card every-week then why isn’t the Government intervening to prevent this from happening (afkr221)? According to the FDA website, Microplastics and nanoplastics may be present in food, primarily from environmental contamination where foods are grown or raised (FDA Program, Human Foods). While some studies suggest there may be impacts to human health from exposure to microplastics and nanoplastics, the overall scientific evidence does not demonstrate that levels of microplastics or nanoplastics found in foods pose a risk to human health. (1) The Food and Drug Administration directly states that microplastics are in the food supply chain. Because the FDA refuses to interfere because there is insufficient scientific evidence to prove the effects on humans. Do not fear, however, the FDA is continually monitoring the presence microplastics and nanoplastics to determine if there could be adverse health problems in the future.

Crushed Plastic Bottles

Conclusion 

So, this begs the question why is the government allowing the production of microplastics in our food supply chain? It could be that we have a limited understanding of microplastics and still discovering those adverse effects on people. Or, the government understands how harmful these microplastics are to our internal and external environment and wants their people to be sick. The sicker everyone is the more money there is to be made and more solutions to problems they invented. Whoever is reading this has to decide if they still want to drink out of plastic water bottles, and why would our government be allowing microplastic to be present in our food supply chain?

bottom of page